Free download · A4 PDF · CISO / CTO grade
Preemptive Defense
Test against your real infrastructure. Break nothing. The clone takes the dangerous hits.
One email. Confirmation by mail. Unsubscribe with one click.
What's inside
The brief covers the architecture, the failure modes it blocks, the regulatory map, and the operator-level evidence an auditor will ask for. Roughly 10 to 14 dense pages.
- The threat model in concrete operator terms
- Architectural mechanism, with adversary-model reasoning
- Failure modes blocked, with named precedents
- Compliance map: specific rules, fines, reporting windows
- ROI math grounded in published numbers
- Vendor comparison on technical approach (not ARR)
- Onboarding shape and known scope limits
- Audit-ready evidence the architecture produces
Related solution pages
The same architecture, applied to specific buyer questions:
Fix vulnerabilities before attackers arrive
Find, test, and patch security gaps on safe clones. Deploy fixes to production with confidence.
Read moreClone production. Let AI attack it.
Create identical copies of your infrastructure and run AI-powered penetration tests — without risking production.
Read moreTest security continuously. Not annually.
Run security tests every day on fresh production clones. Find vulnerabilities when they appear — not months later.
Read moreQuestions readers asked
Who is this brief written for?
A CISO, CTO, or senior infrastructure engineer evaluating the architecture. It assumes familiarity with backup workflows, filesystem fundamentals, and the regulatory landscape your stack already touches.
Is there a non-technical version?
Yes. After you submit your email, the same page links to a five-minute executive PDF you can forward to a CFO, IT director, or board member.
What happens to my email?
One confirmation email. You're added to our newsletter (one short post per month, all-product). Unsubscribe with one click. Your email lives in the EU by default per Rediacc's data-residency policy.
Why btrfs?
The brief explains in detail. The short version: btrfs makes immutability, copy-on-write snapshots, and incremental send/receive properties of the storage layer rather than of an application running on top of it. That changes what an attacker holding root credentials can defeat.
Does this apply to managed services like AWS RDS?
Not directly. The architecture covers self-managed compute with containerized databases on btrfs-backed volumes. If your recovery-critical estate sits in RDS or Aurora, the brief flags this explicitly and points to where the model does and doesn't apply.
About this brief
Rediacc is a Tallinn-based infrastructure protection company building btrfs-native backup and disaster recovery on commodity Linux. This brief was written by the engineering team, edited against an anti-AI-slop style guide, and reviewed for technical accuracy before publication.
Have a question we should add to this page? Tell us at hello@rediacc.com.
Download short brief (PDF)