Skip to main content Skip to navigation Skip to footer
Limited time: Design Partner Program — BUSINESS plan free for life
PREEMPTIVE DEFENSE

Fix vulnerabilities before attackers arrive

Test your patch on an exact copy of production first. Then deploy the fix for real, sure it works.

Every scanner finds holes. None let you test the fix on a real copy of production first. We do.

$ rdc term production cve-2026-1234-fix
Cloning production environment .. done (47s)
→ Clone: prod-vuln-fix-1234 (380 GB, btrfs CoW: 2.1 GB)
Applying patch: OpenSSL 3.0.8 → 3.0.15 .. done
Restarting affected services .. done (12s)
→ Keycloak restarted · Nextcloud restarted · GitLab restarted
Running verification suite ....
→ CVE-2026-1234 re-scan: PATCHED
→ Service health checks: all passing
→ Regression tests (247 assertions): 0 failures
→ TLS handshake verification: valid
✓ Patch verified. Safe to deploy to production.
Time: 3m 41s    CVE: patched    Services: 3/3 healthy

Illustrative output; actual runs may include extra logs.

<4min
Patch + verify time
Safe
Test before deploy
0
Unverified patches
THE PROBLEM

Patching in production is a gamble

You found a vulnerability. Now you need to patch it. But will the patch break something? You can't test in production. And your staging copy is 3 weeks behind. So you rush the fix and hope. Or you wait and stay exposed. Neither one is good. Both cost you money.

30.6 days average time to patch weaponized vulnerabilities Qualys TruRisk Research Report 2023 [1]
180% more breaches that started with an unpatched vulnerability Verizon DBIR 2024 [2]
$4.88M average cost of a data breach IBM Cost of a Data Breach 2024 [3]
Traditional patching
Day 1 CVE disclosed
Week 1-2 Check the impact
Week 3-4 Test on staging
Week 5 Schedule a window
Reality Patch breaks production
With Rediacc
Copy + patch
<4 min
Verified
Deploy
THE REAL COST

What’s slow patching costing you?

Every day a vulnerability sits unpatched is a day you’re exposed. Every rushed patch risks a production incident.

Remediation cost calculator

Without Rediacc
Exposure per vuln21 days
Failed patches / year15
Remediation labor$63,000
Annual remediation cost
$138,000
With Rediacc
Exposure per vuln1 day
Failed patches / year0
Remediation labor$18,000
Annual remediation cost
$22,800
Model: Traditional remediation labor at $150/hr avg (security engineer time for impact assessment, staging setup, testing, rollback). Failed patches estimated at 25% based on industry experience. Rediacc reduces fix time to <1 day with clone-based verification, eliminating patch failures.
HOW IT WORKS

One command. Verified fixes.

1

Detect

A scan finds a problem: a CVE, a bad setting, or an exposed service. The worst ones come first.

2

Copy + Patch

Copy production in 47 seconds. Apply the fix to the copy. Run full tests against your real data and settings.

3

Verify + Deploy

Check that the hole is closed and nothing else broke. Deploy to production with confidence. Then delete the copy.

CVE-2026-1234 Critical
OpenSSL 3.0.8 — VULN
Keycloak :8443 — affected
Nextcloud :443 — affected
GitLab :443 — affected
47s + 2m
Clone: Patch Test Testing
OpenSSL → 3.0.15 — APPLIED
Keycloak restart — healthy
Nextcloud restart — healthy
247 assertions — 0 failures
verified
Production Patched
OpenSSL 3.0.15 — FIXED
CVE-2026-1234 — PATCHED
3/3 services — healthy
0 regressions — verified
UNDER THE HOOD

Why copy-based patching works

Old patching needs a staging copy that matches production. But staging drifts within days. Rediacc makes an instant copy of your real production setup in seconds. It uses btrfs, the storage engine that makes cheap instant copies possible. You apply the patch on the copy. You test it against real data and real settings. If it works, you deploy to production. If it fails, you throw the copy away. Production stays untouched.

Traditional patching
Rediacc
Staging (weeks old, drifted from production)
Production copy (seconds old, 100% match)
Days to weeks (staging setup + testing)
Under 4 minutes (copy + patch + verify)
Untested patches can break production
0%, failures caught on the copy and thrown away
Hope the rollback script works
Delete the copy, production never changed
WHY IT MATTERS

What you get

Safe patching

Test every fix on an exact copy of production before you deploy. If the patch breaks something, throw the copy away. Production untouched.

Same-day fixes

Go from a new CVE to a tested production fix in under 4 minutes. No more month-long exposure.

Full verification

Every patch gets a full check: CVE re-scan, service health, regression tests, and TLS. All on real production data.

A critical CVE dropped on a Friday afternoon. By Saturday morning we’d cloned production, applied the patch, verified it against all 4 affected services, and deployed — zero downtime. Our previous process would have taken 3 weeks and a change management meeting.
Before
3 weeks
After
<4 min
Patch + verify + deploy time

Patch faster. Patch safer.

Start with the free Community edition. Verify your first patch in under 4 minutes.

Claim Design Partner No credit card required
$ rdc term production cve-2026-1234-fix

Short on time?

Skip the deep-dive. Grab the five-minute version your team can read at a stand-up.

Download short brief (PDF)
Test any app in a container
If it runs in a container, Rediacc can copy it, patch it, and verify it. Databases, mail servers, CI/CD, CMS, monitoring, auth, all of it.
Sources & References
  1. Qualys, “TruRisk Research Report,” 2023. “On average, weaponized vulnerabilities are patched within 30.6 days yet only patched an average of 57.7% of the time.” www.qualys.com
  2. Verizon, “2024 Data Breach Investigations Report,” May 2024. “The exploitation of vulnerabilities as an initial point of entry almost tripled from the previous year, accounting for 14% of all breaches.” www.verizon.com
  3. IBM Security, “Cost of a Data Breach Report,” July 2024. “The global average cost of a data breach reached USD 4.88 million in 2024.” newsroom.ibm.com
Product performance claims are based on Rediacc’s btrfs copy-on-write architecture. Calculator estimates use industry-standard cost models; actual costs vary by organization.